When a
male boss spreads himself under the sheets with female colleagues (and these
women are excelling for reasons everyone–including the office janitor–can
explain), should the underlings in the group (1) tut-tut in annoyance, gnash
their teeth and try to do their job anyway, (2) feign innocence, become
political monks and reside above gossip, (3) get circumstantial evidence and
snitch on them to the biggest boss or (4) just plain move on?
Ex-Letterman
Writer Nell Scovell, according to her essay published yesterday in Vanity
Fair, shrugged
and took route 4. She decided she couldn’t do anything to upset the banana cart
steered by the Big, gap-toothed Banana, probably figuring that one day she may
have to come back to the Big Banana to give her a leg up (oh, grow up,
people). Instead, she focused on
what she loved, which was her genre of writing and moved on to yet another
writing job where, she says, “the atmosphere was respectful”.
“I stayed for several seasons. Since then, I’ve racked up a long list of credits as a TV writer, series creator, producer, and director. In short, I moved on.”
Scovell’s
essay, written with zero defensiveness, got me on her side very quickly. At first. By the time I reached the end
of her story, however, I felt something was wrong with the picture. Why? Scovell, I felt, had taken the easy way out. I commend her on her pragmatism, her
focus on what would get her mileage in the short and the long term and her
sense of priority (as it related to her career, her family and her peace of
mind). But I was disappointed that a woman wielding such an obviously fluid pen
didn’t care to use it to dice, mince and squish out the Big Banana–along with
his Nilla wafers–when she had the chance.
Publishing
her essay now–many years later and for a very tidy sum, no doubt–long after the
fruit is mottled and limp doesn’t get her any brownie points from me. For one,
her non-confrontational stance didn’t further the fight against sexual
harassment of women and the intimidation of women in a male-dominated
workplace. Secondly, what did she do to garner the respect of her gum-chewing,
fart-joke writing male colleagues? When things didn’t work out, she simply
shrugged and left. That’s all. She didn’t show the men in her writing group–men
who must have sisters and mothers and grandmothers–that almost every member of
the fairer sex ultimately wants fairness even if one among them may prefer to
strut sexy.
By
sneaking out of the Letterman den without a squeak even when Letterman asked
her why she was leaving (Oprah might say “Gurl, what were you thinkin’?”), Scovell dragged
women back several decades to a time before the sixties when Gloria Steinem and
Betty Freidan began fighting for fair treatment of women, at home and in the
workplace.
I’ll sign off with Steinem's 1971 Address to the Women of America which addressed the issues of sexism and misogyny and racism and class.
“This is no
simple reform. It really is a revolution. Sex and race, because they are easy, visibledifferences, have been the primary ways of organizing human beings into superior
and inferior groups, and into the cheap labor on which this system still
depends. We are talking about a society in which there will be no roles other
than those chosen, or those earned. We are really talking about humanism.”
